Blogs2011DecemberNovemberOctoberSeptemberAugust2008DecemberNovemberOctoberSeptemberAugustJuly
Ordering Made Easy

Order Now
Order Online
Call 1-800-DNA-TEST Give us a Call
1-800-DNA-TEST
Find a Collection Center

Orchid utilizes a network of over 5000 collection sites worldwide.
Accreditations

Orchid Cellmark holds multiple accreditations from various organizations and adheres to the standards of each accrediting organization. Compliance by our laboratories to these accreditation requirements provides assurance to our clients that test results provided by Orchid Cellmark are of the highest quality. Clink on the links above to learn more about our accreditations.
Blog

DOUBT DOWN UNDER  Monday, December 22, 2008

Section 143 of Australia's Child Support Act is being put to the test. The law provides a legal basis for men to take action if they can successfully challenge paternity. Since the legislation was enacted almost two years ago, more than 300 men have had requests approved to stop child support payments. DNA test results have provided the basis for 18 of those men to file for repayment, totaling more than $170,000 to date.

The Courier-Mail



Comments (1)

BELATED HOMECOMING  Monday, December 15, 2008

World War I has been over for nearly a century and while many lives were lost, they have not been forgotten. In fact, DNA testing may mean honor and a proper resting place will be bestowed on some 400 Australian and British soldiers. A mass grave was discovered earlier this year in Pheasant Wood, Fromelles in France based on meticulous research by an amateur historian. Exhumation of the bodies and forensic DNA testing is to begin next year.

[Australian Broadcasting Corporation]



Comments (0)

TRUTH & CONSEQUENCES  Thursday, December 11, 2008

Paternity fraud is becoming a global epidemic, and courts around the world are trying to figure out the best way to deal with such cases. The outcome is soon to be determined for one London couple. The prosecution alleges the man and his lover switched samples back in 2001 to falsify the results of a DNA paternity test. The case also highlights the importance of performing court-ready or legal DNA tests which maintain a strict chain of custody and require samples to be collected by an impartial third party.

[Daily Dispatch Online]



Comments (0)